News · Legislation

The Major Richard Star Act in 2026: where it stands and what it means for CRSC

The Star Act would let combat-disabled medical retirees keep their full military retirement pay and their full VA disability — with no offset. As of late June 2026 it's not law. Here's the real status, the funding "catch" in the headlines, and why CRSC is still the tool that works today.

Information verified through June 29, 2026

Plain-English summary: The Major Richard Star Act would let combat-disabled medical retirees keep their full retirement pay and their full VA disability — no offset. As of late June 2026 it is not law; it's bundled into a larger bill whose House vote has stalled. For combat-disabled Chapter 61 retirees, CRSC remains the tool that works today.

If you are a medically retired veteran with a combat-related disability, here is the short version. The Major Richard Star Act would end the rule that forces many medical retirees to give up a dollar of retired pay for every dollar of VA disability they receive. It has not become law. In June 2026 it was folded into a much larger package — the Take Care of America's Veterans Act — and the House vote on that package stalled before any floor action. Nothing about your Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) has changed. CRSC is still the mechanism that lets combat-disabled retirees recover that offset right now, while the bill works its way through Congress.

That distinction — proposed versus enacted — matters this week, because the headlines have been loud and the details have been blurry.

Key takeaways

  • The Major Richard Star Act (H.R. 2102 / S. 1032) would grant concurrent receipt — full retired pay and full VA disability, no offset — to roughly 54,000 combat-disabled medical retirees. It is not yet law.
  • In June 2026 it was packaged into the Take Care of America's Veterans Act (H.R. 9237 / S. 4744). The House vote stalled the week of June 22 over an unrelated floor fight, not over the Star Act itself.
  • The package pays for itself partly by changing tinnitus and sleep apnea ratings — but only for veterans who apply in the future. Veterans already receiving those ratings would not be affected.
  • CRSC has not changed. For combat-disabled Chapter 61 retirees under 20 years, CRSC is still the only way to recover the retired-pay offset today.
  • Build your combat-related record now. It pays off under CRSC regardless of what Congress does.

What the Major Richard Star Act would actually do

CRSC exists because of a rule most civilians find baffling: under current law, many retirees cannot receive their full military retired pay and their full VA disability compensation at the same time. They have to "waive" retired pay, dollar for dollar, to receive tax-free VA compensation. Two partial workarounds exist. CRDP (Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay) restores the waived amount for retirees with 20 or more years of service and a VA rating of 50% or higher. CRSC restores it — tax-free — for the portion of disability that is combat-related, and it is open to medical (Chapter 61) retirees who don't have 20 years.

That leaves a specific group out in the cold: service members who were medically retired before reaching 20 years because of a combat injury. They are too disabled to keep serving, but they don't have the longevity for CRDP. Their only offset-recovery tool is CRSC, and CRSC only covers the combat-related share.

The Major Richard Star Act targets exactly that gap. It would extend full concurrent receipt to Chapter 61 retirees with combat-related disabilities who are eligible for CRSC, so they could draw both their full retirement and their full VA compensation. The Congressional estimate is about 54,000 veterans affected, at a cost of roughly $11 billion over ten years.

The bill is named for Maj. Richard Star, an Army Reserve combat engineer who was medically retired in 2018 and died in 2021 of cancer linked to burn-pit exposure in Iraq and Afghanistan. With fewer than 20 years of service, he learned his VA compensation would be subtracted from his retirement, and he spent his final years pressing Congress to fix it.

Where it stands right now (June 2026)

The standalone Star Act has long enjoyed lopsided support — Military Times reports backing from 336 House members and 79 senators — but it kept stalling because it never included a way to pay for it, and budget rules require an offset for new mandatory spending.

To break that logjam, on June 10, 2026, House Veterans' Affairs Committee Chairman Mike Bost (R-Ill.) and Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee Chairman Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) introduced the Take Care of America's Veterans Act — H.R. 9237 in the House, S. 4744 in the Senate. It is a roughly 554-page package combining 62 separate veterans bills, and it includes the full text of the Major Richard Star Act, the Love Lives On Act (which would let surviving spouses keep benefits if they remarry before 55), increased compensation for catastrophically injured veterans' families, and more.

The package cleared the committee stage and was lined up for a House floor vote the week of June 22. The floor vote did not happen. According to Military Times, all House votes were halted amid an impasse over an unrelated measure — the SAVE Act, an elections bill that is a White House priority. As of this writing, the package is stalled, not defeated, and the Senate had not scheduled its own vote.

In short: this is pending legislation. It has not passed either chamber. It is not law. No CRSC rule, rate, or deadline has changed because of it.

The funding "catch": tinnitus and sleep apnea

Here is the part driving the alarming headlines, and the part it is most important to get right.

To cover the cost of the Star Act and the other 61 bills, the Take Care of America's Veterans Act would change how the VA rates two very common conditions for future claims:

The Disabled American Veterans estimates these changes could affect up to 1.5 million veterans and reduce future compensation by about $57 billion over ten years. Roughly 1.3 million veterans currently receive compensation for sleep apnea and more than 1.5 million for tinnitus.

But read this carefully, because the headlines often skip it: the changes would apply only to veterans who file for these conditions in the future. Reporting from Military Times is explicit that the reductions would not affect veterans who already receive that compensation. If your tinnitus or sleep apnea is already rated, this proposal — even if it becomes law — does not reach back and cut it.

This is also why the offset is contested. The VFW, DAV, and Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America oppose paying for one group's benefits by trimming another's, and the ranking Democrats on both veterans' committees have pushed to pass the Star Act on its own instead. The American Legion has called the bundled approach a "pragmatic path forward" given years of gridlock. We're not here to take a side in that debate — only to make sure you can see the actual mechanics through the noise.

What this means for military retirees

For the retirees we work with, four practical points matter most.

1. If you're a combat-disabled Chapter 61 retiree, the Star Act is the bill to watch — but don't wait on it.

It would be a real improvement for you. It is also not guaranteed to pass, and "stalled in a stalled chamber" is a long way from a signature. CRSC works today. It is the only path that currently lets an under-20-year medical retiree recover the retired-pay offset, and the Soto decision already removed the six-year cap on CRSC back pay (we cover that in our Soto guide).

2. Even if the Star Act passes, CRSC won't become irrelevant.

CRSC is tax-free; restored retired pay under concurrent receipt is taxable. CRSC and concurrent receipt are mutually exclusive — you elect the one that's better for you, and you get an annual window to switch. For many combat-disabled retirees, CRSC's tax-free status can still make it the better election. That's a personal calculation, not a one-size answer, and it's exactly the kind of comparison we walk through with clients. (See CRSC vs. CRDP.)

3. If you already get tinnitus or sleep-apnea compensation, you are not in the crosshairs.

The proposed changes are forward-looking. Don't let a scary headline push you into a rushed or panicked decision about ratings you already hold.

4. The combat-related record you build for CRSC is never wasted.

Whether Congress restores full concurrent receipt or not, the documentation that proves a condition is combat-related — incident reports, line-of-duty findings, award citations, the causation narrative — is what unlocks tax-free CRSC. That work holds its value no matter which way the bill goes.

What you should do now

Document checklist for a combat-related (CRSC) claim

Frequently asked questions

Has the Major Richard Star Act passed in 2026?

No. As of June 29, 2026, it has not become law. Its text is included in the Take Care of America's Veterans Act (H.R. 9237 / S. 4744), and the House vote on that package stalled the week of June 22 over an unrelated floor dispute. It remains pending.

Does the Richard Star Act change CRSC?

Not today. CRSC's rules, categories, and effective dates are unchanged. If the Star Act becomes law, eligible Chapter 61 retirees could receive full concurrent receipt, but you would still want to compare CRSC (tax-free) against concurrent receipt (taxable) before electing.

Are VA tinnitus and sleep-apnea ratings being cut?

There is a proposal to change how both are rated for future applicants, attached to the Take Care of America's Veterans Act as a funding offset. It is not law, and reporting indicates it would not affect veterans who already receive those ratings.

Who would the Richard Star Act help?

Roughly 54,000 combat-disabled medical (Chapter 61) retirees who, because they have fewer than 20 years of service, currently cannot receive full retired pay and full VA compensation at the same time.

Should I wait for the bill before filing for CRSC?

We don't recommend waiting. CRSC works now, the Soto decision removed the back-pay cap, and the combat-related evidence you assemble keeps its value regardless of what Congress does.

The bottom line

The Major Richard Star Act is closer to the floor than it has been in years, and that is genuinely good news for combat-disabled medical retirees. But "closer" is not "passed." Right now it is bundled into a larger, contested bill whose vote has stalled, and the only thing that has actually changed for you is the news cycle. CRSC remains the working tool for recovering the offset, the Soto decision still governs back pay, and a well-documented combat-related claim is still the difference between a denial and tax-free compensation. We'll keep tracking the bill and update this page when something real changes.

Not sure if CRSC fits your situation?

Free 15-minute case review. We'll look at your conditions and records, tell you whether CRSC applies to you today, and explain what a board-ready packet would need to prove. No cost. No obligation.

Book Free 15-Minute CRSC Review Call (830) 266-7140 Get the Book

Not ready to talk yet? Send Me the Quickstart Kit →